Saturday, February 29, 2020

The Different Meanings of Dürfen in German

The Different Meanings of Dà ¼rfen in German Dà ¼rfen  (to be allowed to) is one of the six modal verbs  that are so essential in both English and German. As with other modal verbs, it is almost always used with another verb in a sentence. Dà ¼rfen  can also take on a few different meanings, depending on its context: As opposed to kà ¶nnen  (can, to be able to), the spelling of dà ¼rfen is far different from its English equivalent may, allowed/permitted to. This makes it a little more challenging to study, but its so important that students of the German language should fully understand its various meanings and learn how to conjugate dà ¼rfen. Dà ¼rfen: To Be Allowed to The main definition of dà ¼rfen  is may or to be allowed to. This is the most common use for the verb and you will find yourself using it quite often. Darf ich draußen spielen, Mutti? (May I play outside, Mom?)Der Schà ¼ler durfte nur einEN Bleistift und einEN Radiergummi zur Prà ¼fung mitbringen. (The student was only allowed to bring a pencil and an eraser to the exam.) When it comes to dà ¼rfen,  it seems that both English and German speakers make the same mistake. Did your English teacher ever reply to you with â€Å"I don’t know if you can, but you certainly may† in response to a question you formulated with â€Å"Can I†¦Ã¢â‚¬ , instead of â€Å"May I†¦?† Germans share the same habit as you can compare in these two sentences which have completely different meanings: Kann ich bitte zur Toilette hingehen? (Can I go to the washroom?)Darf ich bitte zur Toilette hingehen?  (May I go to the washroom?) Dà ¼rfen: Polite Requests Dà ¼rfen  can also be used as a form of politeness when asking a question or making a request. Wenn ich bitten darf, mit welcher Fluglinie sind Sie geflogen?  (If I may ask, on which airline did you fly?Darf ich rein?  (May I come in?) Dà ¼rfen: A Possibility There are also times when you may want to use dà ¼rfen  to indicate a strong possibility that something will happen. To form  this meaning of dà ¼rfen, the subjunctive II must be used. Sie dà ¼rfte um 8 Uhr hier sein.  (She will most likely be here at 8 o’clock.)Meine Tante dà ¼rfte bald mehr Geld bekommen.  (My aunt will most likely receive more money.) Nicht Dà ¼rfen   When you add an infinitive verb to nicht dà ¼rfen, you express the prohibition of something. Hier darf man nicht schwimmen.  (You are not allowed to swim here.) When you add the subjunctive II and an infinitive to nicht dà ¼rfen, you express an accusation. Deine Hausaufgaben httest du nicht vergessen dà ¼rfen, jetzt bekommst du keine gute Note. (You should not have forgotten your homework, now you won’t receive a good mark.)

Thursday, February 13, 2020

Insolvency Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 5000 words

Insolvency Law - Essay Example This concept of COMI has been used to allow the more powerful creditor to choose the regime that best suits their needs to maximize their return on credit. The following discussion is going to examine the theory of Professor Jackson and then consider whether he is indeed correct with insolvency law in the UK in domestic cases and then in consideration of cross-border proceedings where the EU regulations apply. In the US insolvency law seems to more geared towards the creditor regaining their money back, because in good faith they have lent it out. Jackson argues that the assets of the individual should be pooled together and divided amongst the creditors on the strict economic basis to maximize the return of credit to the creditor.1 This would mean that the laws that offer this maximization of credit should be applied, even if there are different jurisdictions because the debt crosses state or international borders.2 Therefore this will be illustrated as the approach taken by the EU in regard to the new trans-border insolvency regulations, rather than individual actions for each creditor in differing jurisdictions. The enforcement of individual creditors needs versus the individual debtors needs is the soft approach that the UK system of law takes and NOT in the best interests of creditors because they should be able to get the maximum return of credit because they are already a loss. Jac kson argues this hard economic approach, rather than an approach that considers the interests of the debtor.3 This is fair because the creditor in good faith has lent this money to the debtor expecting its return; therefore in the case that this is not possible the maximization of this return should be available.4 Therefore the question that has to be asked is what would the creditors' agreed to take prior to the insolvency and divided the assets this way, in order to get some return on the money lent in good faith, which is known as the creditor's bargain: The Creditor's Bargain Model was developed by Professor Jackson. The model in simplest terms was utilized to analyze almost any bankruptcy issue by asking the theoretical question: What would creditors agreed to if they had been asked in advance of insolvency Professor Jackson argued that normative bankruptcy principles should be viewed as resolving a limited common-pool problem caused by the execution and enforcement of individual creditor remedies when the debtor has insufficient assets to satisfy all claims.5 As one can see in the formula that Jackson uses the rights of the debtor are not considered, such as the right to a home and funds to live on. In the UK there is a lot softer system; however in light of the cross border insolvency regulations that the EU has introduced this will soon change for cases that transcend borders. UK Insolvency Law: The following discussion will consider the SSGR and UK insolvency proceedings; however with COMI being in force the protections provided to the consumer may be eroded in another jurisdiction where

Saturday, February 1, 2020

Lab work for an 8 week semester Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Work for an 8 week semester - Lab Report Example This is inertia because the sudden change of speed alters the state of the water inside the glass, which was in motion. d) After walking in a straight line with a constant speed then making an abrupt stop, the water experience turbulence. This turbulence is caused by inertia Questions 1) The observations of the behavior of water inside the container (turbulence) conform to Newton’s law of inertia. While moving with the container, water inside the glass also moves at the same speed. When an abrupt stop or left or right hand turn is made, the speed of the water inside the container is suddenly changed and water resists this change of motion (Nardo, Don, and Ashlee 16). 2) While the container is accelerated towards the left, water moves in the same direction of acceleration and resists the forces that compel it to stop. 3) Another similar example to this experiment is when one is driving a car. The body of the driver will be moving at a speed that is equal to the speed of the car . When the driver makes a sudden stop, his body will continue moving at the speed and he will resist the sudden change of speed. Therefore, the driver’s body will experience inertia, which is the reluctance to sudden change of motion or speed The washers with the larger mass and weight pull the washers on the other side of the pulley. The lighter washers move up the pulley while the heavier washers move down the pulley. Trial M1 M2 Change of M2 Time (s) Acceleration 1 1.4 3.0 1.6 0.51 12.1 2 1.4 3.2 1.8 0.56 11.5 3 1.6 3.5 1.9 0.66 8.6 4 1.5 3.6 2.1 0.68 9.1 5 1.6 3.8 2.2 0.66 10.2 Trial M1 M2 Change of M2 Time (s) Acceleration 1 0.9 3.0 2.1 0.68 9.1 2 1.9 3.5 1.6 0.58 9.6 3 1.2 3.8 2.6 0.81 8.0 4 0.9 3.9 3.0 0.77 10.2 5 0.7 3.2 2.5 0.71 10.0 Newton’s third Law of motion In this experiment, the balloon is tied to a straw in which a string passes through. Both ends of the string are attached to two chairs that are separated ten meters away from each other. The balloon i s inflated with air and placed next to one end of a chair. Observation: On releasing the balloon, it moves instantaneously in the opposite direction while it pools the straw towards the other end of the chair. This observation can be used to explain Newton’s third law of motion that states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. 1. Explanation of observation: The air that was filled inside the balloon was under pressure. When the balloon is released, the air shoots out of the balloon in an opposite direction. The force exerted by the air that moves out of the balloon has another equal and opposite force (the balloon) that causes the balloon to move in the opposite d